From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klunck v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1912
148 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)

Opinion

January 19, 1912.

Morton L. Fearey, for the appellant.

Sydney A. Syme, for the respondent.


The court has no jurisdiction to entertain this action begun June 2, 1910, by a plaintiff then residing in New Jersey, against a foreign corporation to recover damages for injuries received by defendant's negligence in the State of New Jersey. The plaintiff testified that he had lived for two or three years with his mother in the State of New Jersey before the accident happened in that State, which was in January, 1910; that he voted there in 1909; that in May he was in the hospital; that in June and July he was so living with his mother, and that he supported the family there up to the time of the accident, and that August was the first month that he stayed with his uncle in this State after the accident. Before going to New Jersey he had lived with his uncle, and after the accident had gone back to him, but that he did not so return until after the action was brought is made plain by the plaintiff's avowal of the facts. His uncle testified that while at Amboy the plaintiff "came home Saturdays and holidays." It is inferable that before the plaintiff went to New Jersey the mother lived near the uncle and that the plaintiff was much with the uncle. But did the plaintiff regard Westchester county as his home when he voted in New Jersey in 1909, and while he supported his family there, which was until January, 1910, and while he lived with his mother and sisters until August of that year? The truth appears, and does not enable even a most unfortunate man, a non-resident, to import to this State his cause of action arising under the statute of New Jersey, against a foreign corporation. I refrain from passing upon the merits for the reason that the court should not decide that of which it has not jurisdiction.

The judgment and order should be reversed, with costs.

JENKS, P.J., BURR, WOODWARD and RICH, JJ., concurred.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.


Summaries of

Klunck v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 19, 1912
148 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Case details for

Klunck v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN KLUNCK, Respondent, v . PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1912

Citations

148 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
133 N.Y.S. 207

Citing Cases

Rubel v. Central Railroad Co. of N.J

I think, therefore, that for the purposes of this motion, and upon this record, the residence of the…