Opinion
No. 2009-00420.
July 7, 2009.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), dated November 17, 2008, which denied her motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Lynch Park, LLC, and granted that defendant's cross motion to vacate its default in answering and for leave to serve a late answer.
Harry I. Katz, P.C., Fresh Meadows, N.Y. (Shayne, Dachs, Corker, Sauer Dachs [Jonathan A. Dachs], of counsel), for appellant.
Rubin, Fiorella Friedman, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Leila Cardo of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Skelos, J.P., Florio, Balkin, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Lynch Park, LLC (hereinafter Lynch Park), and in granting Lynch Park's cross motion to vacate its default in answering and for leave to serve a late answer ( see CPLR 5015). Considering the lack of any prejudice to the plaintiff as a result of the relatively short three-week delay in serving an answer, the existence of a potentially meritorious defense, and the public policy favoring the resolution of cases on the merits, the Supreme Court properly excused the de minimis delay in answering ( see Schonfeld v Blue White Food Prods. Corp., 29 AD3d 673; Yonkers Rib House, Inc. v 1789 Cent. Park Corp., 19 AD3d 687; Trimble v SAS Taxi Co. Inc., 8 AD3d 557; see e.g. Perez v Linshar Realty Corp., 259 AD2d 532; Swidler v World-Wide Volkswagen Corp., 85 AD2d 239; cf. Leifer v Pilgreen Corp., 62 AD3d 759 [10-month delay in moving to vacate default in answering or appearing, with no meritorious defense, does not warrant vacatur of default]).