From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KLUG v. KLUG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1999
258 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 22, 1999

Appeal from the order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Blydenburgh, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We reject the defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to articulate the basis for its decision to apply the child support percentage of the Child Support Standards Act, here 29% ( see, Domestic Relations Law § 240) to the combined parental income over $80,000 ( see generally, Matter of Cassano v. Cassano, 85 N.Y.2d 649).

In addition, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion under Domestic Relations Law § 240 Dom. Rel. (1-b)(c)(7) in directing the defendant to pay one-half of the children's college expenses ( see, Cohen v. Cohen, 203 A.D.2d 411).

Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

KLUG v. KLUG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 22, 1999
258 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

KLUG v. KLUG

Case Details

Full title:SUZANNE KLUG, Respondent, v. KARL KLUG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 22, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
683 N.Y.S.2d 912

Citing Cases

Sutka v. Sutka

In light of that determination, it is not necessary to consider the plaintiff's challenge to the Supreme…

Mellen v. Mellen

by a party's account of his [or her] finances, and when a party's account of his [or her] finances is not…