From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klein v. Quinnipiac Univ.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 27, 2019
334 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

11-27-2019

Daniel KLEIN v. QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY

Steven D. Jacobs, in support of the petition. James E. Wildes, in opposition.


Steven D. Jacobs, in support of the petition.

James E. Wildes, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 193 Conn. App. 469 (AC 41964), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had properly decided to instruct the jury regarding the duty of care owed by a landowner to a trespasser but not to instruct the jury regarding the duty of care owed to a licensee?

"2. If the answer to the first question is ‘no,’ did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the error was harmless?"

KAHN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Klein v. Quinnipiac Univ.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 27, 2019
334 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

Klein v. Quinnipiac Univ.

Case Details

Full title:Daniel KLEIN v. QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 27, 2019

Citations

334 Conn. 903 (Conn. 2019)
219 A.3d 799