From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.

City Court of New York, General Term
Oct 1, 1900
32 Misc. 774 (N.Y. Misc. 1900)

Opinion

October, 1900.

Beardsley Hemmens (Samuel A. Beardsley and Henry J. Hemmens, of counsel), for appellants.

Dittenhoefer, Gerber James (A.J. Dittenhoefer and David Gerber, of counsel), for respondent.


This appeal only brings up for review a question of law. Both sides, at the trial, moved for direction of a verdict in plaintiff's favor. No motion for dismissal of complaint was made by defendants when plaintiff rested, as might properly have been done, so their point that plaintiff had not proven ownership is not well taken, the right to so object having been waived by their silence. We think that, under the authorities cited ( 96 U.S. 51, 7 Wall. 82 and 31 Misc. 87), the ruling of the trial justice was correct.

FITZSIMONS, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.

City Court of New York, General Term
Oct 1, 1900
32 Misc. 774 (N.Y. Misc. 1900)
Case details for

Klein v. East River Electric Light Co.

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK KLEIN, Respondent, v . THE EAST RIVER ELECTRIC LIGHT Co. et al.…

Court:City Court of New York, General Term

Date published: Oct 1, 1900

Citations

32 Misc. 774 (N.Y. Misc. 1900)