From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kisswani v. Manikis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2003
303 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-04174

Submitted February 26, 2003.

March 24, 2003.

In an action to enforce a judgment, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golar, J.), dated April 26, 2002, which deemed the defendant's motion, denominated, inter alia, as one to vacate a judgment of the same court, entered June 24, 1998, as a motion for leave to reargue an earlier motion, among other things, to vacate the judgment, which was denied by an order of the same court, dated January 5, 1999, and denied reargument.

Feldman Delio, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Stacie Bryce Feldman and Michael D. Nachtome of counsel), for appellant.

Goldberg, Scudieri, Lindenberg Block, P.C., New York, N.Y. (John D. Robalino of counsel), for respondent.

Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly deemed the defendant's motion to be one for leave to reargue, and no appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see Munz v. LaGuardia Hosp., 109 A.D.2d 731).

FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kisswani v. Manikis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2003
303 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Kisswani v. Manikis

Case Details

Full title:FATHIA KISSWANI, respondent, v. ANASTASIOS MANIKIS, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 643 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 787

Citing Cases

Mount Sinai Hosp v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co.

In addition, the appellant neither submitted new facts not offered on the prior motion, nor demonstrated a…

Farduchi v. United Artists Theatre Circuit

However, FRP appeals from so much of the order dated July 9, 2004, as denied its cross motion for leave to…