From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kirk v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1980
79 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

December 29, 1980


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 20, 1980, as, upon defendants' motion for discovery and her cross motion for a protective order, directed her to appear for an examination before trial and to provide certain medical authorizations and personal income tax records. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, defendants' motion is denied insofar as it seeks to compel plaintiff to appear for an examination before trial and to provide the authorizations in question and the personal income tax records and plaintiff's cross motion for a protective order is granted with respect thereto. The record fails to indicate any unusual or unanticipated circumstances that would permit the conducting of further discovery nine months after the case had been placed on the trial calendar (see Mazzuka v. Long Is. R.R., 54 A.D.2d 690; Williams v. New York City Tr. Auth., 23 A.D.2d 590; Giddens v Moultrie, 66 A.D.2d 993; Finn v. Crystal Beach Tr. Co., 55 A.D.2d 1001). Mollen, P.J., Titone, Mangano and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kirk v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1980
79 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Kirk v. Blum

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE C. KIRK, Appellant, v. EILEEN BLUM et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1980

Citations

79 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Gershon v. South Nassau Communities Hospital

Additionally, the record indicates that the plaintiff unreasonably sought to conduct discovery throughout the…

Cruz v. Covert

Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.21 (e) a motion to vacate the note of issue for lack of readiness must be filed…