In Kirchner v. Miller,39 N.J. Eq. 355, relief on the ground of mutual mistake was denied because the complainant would suffer no hardship in being required to tear down and reconstruct an encroaching wooden structure at a cost of $100.
Summary of this case from Dorfman v. LiebNo. 07-P-279.
March 27, 2008.
Judgment affirmed.
In Kirchner v. Miller,39 N.J. Eq. 355, relief on the ground of mutual mistake was denied because the complainant would suffer no hardship in being required to tear down and reconstruct an encroaching wooden structure at a cost of $100.
Summary of this case from Dorfman v. LiebIn Kirchner v. Miller, 39 N. J. Eq. 355, relief on the ground of mutual mistake was denied because the complainant would suffer no hardship in being required to tear down, and reconstruct, an encroaching wooden structure at a cost of $100.
Summary of this case from Dorfman v. LiebIn Kirchner v. Miller, 39 N. J. Eq. 355, the complainant made a mistake of a few inches in surveying the line between his land and the defendant's, for which mistake the defendant was not responsible, and of which he was not aware until after complainant had built.
Summary of this case from Sumner v. SeatonFull title:THEODORE KIRCHNER v. FOSTER MILLER ASSOCIATES, INC
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Mar 27, 2008
The Court of Chancery of New Jersey held that the plaintiff was entitled to relief and required the…
Sumner v. SeatonLord CANWORTH, in the house of lords in Ramsden v. Dyson, L. R. 1 H. L. 129, at page 141, after stating the…