Opinion
31520-21S
08-23-2023
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
On August 11, 2023, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the ground that the Petition herein was not filed within the time prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.). Respondent states in the Motion to Dismiss that petitioner has no objection to the granting thereof. The record establishes that the Petition was not timely filed. See I.R.C. §§ 6213(a) and 7502; Patmon & Young Pro. Corp. v. Commissioner, 55 F.3d 216 (6th Cir. 1995), aff 'g T.C. Memo. 1993-143; Hallmark Rsch. Collective v. Commissioner, No. 21284-21, 159 T.C. (Nov. 29, 2022).
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.