From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kinnard v. Navarro

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 21, 2024
22-cv-02534-JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-02534-JSW

03-21-2024

KENNETH KINNARD, Plaintiff, v. STEVE NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 47

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Now before the Court is the Rule 60 motion filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Kinnard (“Plaintiff”). (Dkt. No. 47.) Plaintiff's motion was filed after the notice of appeal was filed, and this Court thus lacks jurisdiction to entertain Plaintiff's motion. Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 586 (9th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kinnard v. Navarro

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 21, 2024
22-cv-02534-JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Kinnard v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH KINNARD, Plaintiff, v. STEVE NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 21, 2024

Citations

22-cv-02534-JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)