From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
May 2, 2013
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-0186-MEF (M.D. Ala. May. 2, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-0186-MEF

05-02-2013

BENNY RAY KING, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

On April 3, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #33) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.

2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion filed by King is DENIED, as it was filed after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f) and the claims therein entitle him to no relief.

Mark E. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

King v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
May 2, 2013
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-0186-MEF (M.D. Ala. May. 2, 2013)
Case details for

King v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BENNY RAY KING, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 2, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-0186-MEF (M.D. Ala. May. 2, 2013)

Citing Cases

Moore v. United States

(Doc. 66-1 at 12). See also King v. United States, No. 2:11CV186-MEF, 2013 WL 1857689, at *3 (M.D. Ala. Apr.…