King v. the State

Full title: KING v. THE STATE. MARTIN v. THE STATE

Court: Supreme Court of New Hampshire Carroll

Date published: Dec 1, 1893

38 A. 207 (N.H. 1893)

67 N.H. 598

Opinion

Decided December, 1893.

Fred B. Osgood, for the plaintiffs.

Solicitor and James W. Remick, for the state.

Per Curiam.[fn*] [fn*] See foot-note on page 80.

The facts are substantially the same as in Sylvester v. State, 65 N.H. 193; — see, also, Philpot v. State, 65 N.H. 250, and Leonard v. State, 65 N.H. 671.

Petitions denied.

All concurred.