From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 3, 1996
665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-3254.

January 3, 1996.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Jr., Judge.

Jawan King, Vernon, pro se appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anne Carrion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The record before us does not indicate whether appellant has sought administrative relief in his attempt to secure gain time credit from the department of corrections. We affirm the order under review without prejudice to appellant's ability to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court after he exhausts his administrative remedies. See Barber v. State, 661 So.2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

King v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 3, 1996
665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAWAN KING, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 3, 1996

Citations

665 So. 2d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

We affirm the order under review without prejudice to appellant's ability to file a petition for writ of…

Steele v. State

Appellant's motion did not indicate whether he exhausted his administrative remedies with DOC. Accordingly,…