From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 29, 1961
344 S.W.2d 693 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. 32887.

March 29, 1961.

Appeal from the 64th Judicial District Court, Hale County, H. M. LaFont, J.

Chas. H. Dean, Plainview, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


Our prior opinion is withdrawn.

The offense is embezzlement; the punishment, 2 years.

The indictment in this case is fatally defective because it fails to allege the ownership of the funds which were empezzled. This is a matter of substance and may be raised at any time. See Ryan v. State, 76 Tex.Crim. R., 176 S.W. 49; Osborne v. State, 93 Tex.Crim. R., 245 S.W. 928; and Martin v. State, 144 Tax.Cr.R. 313, 162 S.W.2d 722.

For the defect pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.

WOODLEY, P. J., absent.


Summaries of

King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 29, 1961
344 S.W.2d 693 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ralph KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 29, 1961

Citations

344 S.W.2d 693 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
171 Tex. Crim. 34

Citing Cases

Flowers v. State

A failure to allege ownership necessitates reversal. King v. State, 171 Tex.Crim. 34, 344 S.W.2d 693 (1961);…