From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 20, 1972
192 S.E.2d 392 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

47454.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 11, 1972.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1972.

Robbery, Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Williams.

Glenn Zell, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Morris H. Rosenberg, Joseph J. Drolet, Joel M. Feldman, for appellee.


Defendant appeals from his conviction for robbery by snatching ( Code Ann. § 26-1901 (c)) and from the denial of his motion for new trial.

The sole issue is whether the court erred in failing to charge the lesser offense of theft by taking ( Code Ann. § 26-1802). The State proved that defendant was a party to a robbery by snatching. Defendant's only evidence was his statement that he was crossing a street in a crowd of people; accidently bumped into a lady; walked on across the street, heard a commotion; turned and saw the lady struggling with his co-defendant; spotted a handbag on the ground; went back, picked it up and offered it to her; and was arrested. In other words, he denies not only the commission of any crime at all, but even a larcenous thought. There being no evidence of conduct which could be interpreted as a theft by taking, the court did not err in failing to charge it. Hill v. State, 229 Ga. 307 ( 191 S.E.2d 58); Hensley v. State, 228 Ga. 501 ( 186 S.E.2d 729); Dutton v. State, 228 Ga. 850 ( 188 S.E.2d 794).

Judgment affirmed. Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 11, 1972 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1972.


Summaries of

King v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 20, 1972
192 S.E.2d 392 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

King v. State

Case Details

Full title:KING v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 20, 1972

Citations

192 S.E.2d 392 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972)
192 S.E.2d 392

Citing Cases

Whitehead v. State

With such a situation, there was no error in failing to charge the jury on the lesser offense of theft by…

White v. State

Accordingly, there was no evidence to warrant a charge on simple battery, and it was not error to refuse the…