From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Chaney v. Stanford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1396 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

03-10-2016

In the Matter of Todd CHANEY, Appellant, v. Tina M. STANFORD, as Chair of the Board of Parole, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Todd Chaney, Attica, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Laura Etlinger of counsel), for respondent.


Todd Chaney, Attica, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Laura Etlinger of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Mott, J.), entered June 5, 2015 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a January 2014 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release. Supreme Court dismissed the petition on the merits, prompting this appeal. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in January 2016, at which time he was granted an open date for parole release. Accordingly, this appeal is moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Irving

v. Evans, 120 A.D.3d 1502, 1502, 992 N.Y.S.2d 452 [2014] ; Matter of Beltran v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 105 A.D.3d 1224, 1224–1225, 962 N.Y.S.2d 919 [2013] ). Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the exception to the mootness doctrine finds no application here (see Matter of Butler v. New York State Div. of Parole, 74 A.D.3d 1533, 1533, 901 N.Y.S.2d 881 [2010] ).

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

McCARTHY, J.P., EGAN JR., ROSE and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Chaney v. Stanford

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 10, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1396 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Chaney v. Stanford

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Todd CHANEY, Appellant, v. Tina M. STANFORD, as Chair of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 10, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1396 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
137 A.D.3d 1396
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1721

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. Stanford

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in April 2017, at…

Sanchez v. Stanford

The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board in April 2017, at…