From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Oklahoma City

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
May 21, 2007
Case No. CIV-06-1308-M (W.D. Okla. May. 21, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-06-1308-M.

May 21, 2007


ORDER


On April 26, 2007, United States Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of plaintiff's constitutional rights. The Magistrate Judge recommended that plaintiff's federal claims be dismissed with prejudice upon filing and that this Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims and that these claims be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object to the Report and Recommendation by May 11, 2007. A review of the file reveals no objection has been filed.

Accordingly, upon de novo review, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 26, 2007;
(2) DISMISSES plaintiff's federal claims with prejudice upon filing;
(3) DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims, and
(4) DISMISSES plaintiff's state law claims without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. Oklahoma City

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
May 21, 2007
Case No. CIV-06-1308-M (W.D. Okla. May. 21, 2007)
Case details for

King v. Oklahoma City

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY F. KING, Plaintiff, v. OKLAHOMA CITY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: May 21, 2007

Citations

Case No. CIV-06-1308-M (W.D. Okla. May. 21, 2007)

Citing Cases

Wade v. Robertson

A court may dismiss a complaint sua sponte "[i]f it is patently obvious that the plaintiff could not prevail…

Plummer v. Town of Dickson

When the unlawful detention is caused by an individual acting under authority of law, it gives rise to a…