From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. McIntyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 20, 2014
No. 9:11-CV-1457 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2014)

Summary

discussing those factors

Summary of this case from Ellerbe v. Jasion

Opinion

No. 9:11-CV-1457

02-20-2014

JAMEL KING, Plaintiff, v. C.O. MCINTYER; LT. MCDERMOTT; C.O. STEVENS; SGT. YOUNG; C.O. KANE; C.O. HESSLE; C.O. DOTY; C.O. CATLIN; DEPT. C. MILLER; COMM. BRIAN FISCHER; and SUP. MARTUSCELLO, Defendants.

APPEARANCES: JAMEL KING, 01-A-4949 Plaintiff pro se Elmira Correctional Facility HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN Attorney General for the State of New York Attorney for Defendants OF COUNSEL: DOUGLAS J. GOGLIA, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


APPEARANCES: JAMEL KING, 01-A-4949
Plaintiff pro se
Elmira Correctional Facility
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General for the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants
OF COUNSEL: DOUGLAS J. GOGLIA, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Jamel King brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 31, 2013, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) be granted in part and denied in part. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Plaintiff requested an extension of time to file objections to the Report-Recommendation and was granted until February 7, 2014 to do so.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

2. Plaintiff's official capacity claims for damages against all defendants are DISMISSED;

3. Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief in the form of stopping harassment at the Coxsackie Correctional Facility is DISMISSED;

4. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Doty are sua sponte DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to serve that defendant; and

5. The remaining defendants C.O. McIntyer; Lt. McDermott; C.O. Stevens; Sgt. Young; C.O. Kane; C.O. Hessle; C.O. Catlin; Dept. C. Miller; Comm. Brian Fischer; and Sup. Martuscello are directed to respond to the complaint as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

United States District Judge
Dated: February 20, 2014

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

King v. McIntyer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 20, 2014
No. 9:11-CV-1457 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2014)

discussing those factors

Summary of this case from Ellerbe v. Jasion
Case details for

King v. McIntyer

Case Details

Full title:JAMEL KING, Plaintiff, v. C.O. MCINTYER; LT. MCDERMOTT; C.O. STEVENS; SGT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 20, 2014

Citations

No. 9:11-CV-1457 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Keyes v. Annucci

This Court has previously found that there is personal involvement (at least for the purposes of a motion to…

Johnson v. Fischer

Consequently, "district courts in this circuit . . . routinely held that a prisoner's allegation that a…