From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Ferrous Processing & Trading Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 6, 2012
Case No. 11-10609 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-10609

09-06-2012

ERIC KING, Plaintiff, v. FERROUS PROCESSING AND TRADING COMPANY, and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, Defendants.


Honorable David M. Lawson


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION,

GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

Presently before the Court is a report issued on August 16, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) recommending that this Court grant the defendants' motions for summary judgment. Although the magistrate judge's reports explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the reports and recommendations waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's reports releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [dkt. #69] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that defendant Ferrous Processing and Trading Company's motion for summary judgment [dkt. #46] is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that defendant International Brotherhood of Teamsters's motion for summary judgment [dkt. #53] is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's complaint DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_________________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on September 6, 2012.

Deborah R. Tofil

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

King v. Ferrous Processing & Trading Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 6, 2012
Case No. 11-10609 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

King v. Ferrous Processing & Trading Co.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC KING, Plaintiff, v. FERROUS PROCESSING AND TRADING COMPANY, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-10609 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

Doran v. McDonald

Dr. Doran does not confirm her intention of utilizing Dr. Emlich as a comparator, but merely states that his…