From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Jan 11, 2010
Civil No. 08-2068 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 11, 2010)

Summary

rejecting the plaintiff's argument that the Consumer Price Index rate should be automatically awarded

Summary of this case from Theis v. Astrue

Opinion

Civil No. 08-2068.

January 11, 2010


ORDER


On this 11th day of January 2010, there comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed in this case on December 22, 2009, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 17). Also before the Court are Plaintiff's objections (Doc. 18) to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $6,039.20.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

King v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Jan 11, 2010
Civil No. 08-2068 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 11, 2010)

rejecting the plaintiff's argument that the Consumer Price Index rate should be automatically awarded

Summary of this case from Theis v. Astrue
Case details for

King v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY KING, PLAINTIFF, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division

Date published: Jan 11, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 08-2068 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 11, 2010)

Citing Cases

Theis v. Astrue

However, the Court rejects the notion that attorney's fees should be determined using an hourly rate…