From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KIMBERLY HAEG v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 2009
64 A.D.3d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-04659.

July 21, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant County of Suffolk appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), dated April 21, 2008, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Christine Malafi, County Attorney, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Ann K. Kandel and Susan A. Flynn of counsel), for appellant.

Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Cannavo, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stephen C. Glasser and Susan M. Jaffe of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment ( see CPLR 3212 [b]).


Summaries of

KIMBERLY HAEG v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 21, 2009
64 A.D.3d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

KIMBERLY HAEG v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY HAEG, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 21, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5945
881 N.Y.S.2d 907

Citing Cases

Bednoski v. Cnty. of Suffolk

can be more than one proximate cause of an accident" and "where varying inferences as to causation are…

Bednoski v. Cnty. of Suffolk

"There can be more than one proximate cause of an accident" and "where varying inferences as to causation are…