From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kim v. Chinn

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Sep 26, 1941
46 Cal.App.2d 854 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)

Opinion

Docket No. 11930.

September 26, 1941.

APPLICATION for writ of supersedeas. Writ denied; demurrer and answer withdrawn from files.

John L. McCarthy and Manwell Manwell for Appellants.

Adolphus Bianchi for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The matters set forth in the application for the writ of supersedeas are legally insufficient to justify the issuance of the writ, especially in that they do not show that appellant's failure to comply with section 948 of the Code of Civil Procedure is excusable. ( Willis v. Paul, 116 Cal.App. 733 [ 3 P.2d 339]; Williams v. Borgwardt, 115 Cal. 617 [47 P. 594]; Nonpareil Mfg. Co. v. McCartney, 143 Cal. 1 [ 76 P. 653]; Reliance Acceptance Corp. v. Lundblade, 96 Cal.App. 371 [ 274 P. 360].) It is ordered, therefore, that the application be and the same is hereby denied.

In response to the order heretofore made under the provisions of section 1107 of the Code of Civil Procedure, respondent herein, besides submitting points and authorities in opposition to the issuance of the writ, prematurely filed therewith a demurrer and an answer to the application; consequently all legal and factual matters set forth in said demurrer and answer have been disregarded, and the clerk of the court is directed to withdraw the same from the files and return them to respondent.


Summaries of

Kim v. Chinn

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Sep 26, 1941
46 Cal.App.2d 854 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
Case details for

Kim v. Chinn

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN KIM, Respondent, v. O.S. CHINN et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Sep 26, 1941

Citations

46 Cal.App.2d 854 (Cal. Ct. App. 1941)
117 P.2d 368