Opinion
2:22-cv-611-KCD
04-02-2024
ORDER
Kyle C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge
Having obtained an award of benefits, Susan Marie Kilpatrick's attorney, Carol Avard, seeks attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 19.) Defendant has no opposition to the request. (Doc. 20.)
Section 406(b) provides that an attorney who obtains a benefits award on remand may petition for a reasonable fee-not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant's past-due benefits-for work performed before the court.
Here, Avard requests $11,647.75, which is 25 percent of past-due benefits. Avard further asserts that the previous EAJA award of $1,054.01 will be returned to Plaintiff. (Doc. 19 at 3); see Paltan v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 519 Fed.Appx. 673, 674 (11th Cir. 2013) (noting that the attorney has the option of either refunding a prior EAJA award to the plaintiff directly or reducing the § 406(b) award by the same amount). For the reasons stated in Kilpatrick's unopposed motion, the requested fee is both reasonable and appropriate under § 406(b).
Accordingly, the unopposed fee motion (Doc. 19) is GRANTED. The clerk will enter judgment for Kilpatrick for $11,647.75 in attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
ORDERED.