From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kilpatrick v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION
Mar 30, 2017
Civil No. 1:16-cv-01014 (W.D. Ark. Mar. 30, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:16-cv-01014

03-30-2017

JAMES WILLIAM KILPATRICK, III PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL Commissioner, Social Security Administration DEFENDANT


JUDGMENT

For reasons stated in a memorandum opinion of this date, I hereby reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

If plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G).

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this 30th day of March 2017.

/s/ Barry A. Bryant

HON. BARRY A. BRYANT

U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Kilpatrick v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION
Mar 30, 2017
Civil No. 1:16-cv-01014 (W.D. Ark. Mar. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Kilpatrick v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILLIAM KILPATRICK, III PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 30, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 1:16-cv-01014 (W.D. Ark. Mar. 30, 2017)