Opinion
Submitted January 27, 1891
Decided February 24, 1891
Robert W. Todd for appellant.
D.G. Crosby for respondent.
ANDREWS, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Kilpatrick v. Barron
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1891
26 N.E. 925 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Kilpatrick v. Barron
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 24, 1891
26 N.E. 925 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Kilpatrick v. Barron
Case Details
Full title:EDWARD KILPATRICK, Respondent, v . MARY E. BARRON, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 24, 1891
Citations
26 N.E. 925 (N.Y. 1891)
26 N.E. 925
36 N.Y. St. Rptr. 15
Citing Cases
Wright v. Mayer
He would not be bound by the adjudication, and could raise the same question in a new proceeding. The cloud…
Weinstein v. KratenseinWe think that the widow and children could not convey a marketable title in fee, and for that reason there…