From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kiilunen v. Moodie

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 15, 1974
55 Mich. App. 128 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

Docket No. 16917.

Decided August 15, 1974. Rehearing granted; appeal dismissed by stipulation November 27, 1974.

Appeal from Livingston, Paul R. Mahinske, J. Submitted Division 2 June 6, 1974, at Lansing. (Docket No. 16917.) Decided August 15, 1974. Rehearing granted; appeal dismissed by stipulation November 27, 1974.

Complaint by Matt and Lillian Kiilunen against Jean Jolly Moodie for conveyance of property purchased on land contract. Default judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

McCririe Latreille, for plaintiffs.

Smith, Losh, Kovaleski Krafsur, for defendant.

Before: McGREGOR, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and O'HARA, JJ.

Former Supreme Court Justice, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Const 1963, art 6, § 23 as amended in 1968.


Defendant appeals from the trial judge's refusal to set aside a default judgment entered when defense counsel failed to appear for a scheduled pretrial conference. Defense counsel claimed lack of official notice as justification for his nonappearance at the pretrial conference.

GCR 1963, 301.9 authorizes the taking of a default when the counsel fails to appear for a pretrial conference:

"Default. Failure to appear at a duly scheduled pretrial conference, unless said conference has been waived in accordance with sub-rule 301.8, shall constitute a default to which provisions of GCR 520 shall be applicable." (Added by amendment of November 11, 1966, effective February 1, 1967).

GCR 1963, 301.10 requires that notice of pretrial be forwarded to counsel at least six weeks before the conference. This notice requirement, however, is applicable to Wayne County Circuit Courts only.

In reviewing the record below, it is clear that defense counsel was present when the conference was scheduled, along with other counsel. On the day of the pretrial, all appeared, with no further notice, except defense counsel.

Defense counsel urged on this appeal that his excuse for nonappearance, in spite of his presence when the date for the pretrial was set, was his expectation of further "official notice", and that failure to send such notice excused his nonappearance.

In Mission Investment Co v Perfect Totalisator Corp, 51 Mich. App. 376; 214 N.W.2d 898 (1974), we cited GCR 1963, 520.4 for the requirement that a motion to set aside a default judgment shall be granted "only if good cause is shown and an affidavit of facts showing a meritorious defense is filed". In Milinsky v Schmidt, Ellis Associates, Inc, 48 Mich. App. 192, 195; 210 N.W.2d 367, 368 (1973), "good cause" was defined:

"`to include (1) a substantial defect or irregularity in the proceedings upon which the default was based, (2) a reasonable excuse for failure to comply with the requirements which created the default, or (3) some other reason showing that manifest injustice would result from permitting the default to stand.'"

Defendant did not comply with the affidavit requirement of GCR 1963, 520.4 nor do we otherwise find "good cause" for defense counsel's failure to appear at the pretrial conference. Defendant claims that the failure of the trial court to send notice was an "irregularity" in the proceeding. As noted above, notice is required by Wayne County Circuit Courts only; this action was in Livingston County. Likewise, defendant has not satisfied requirements (2) and (3) set out in Milinsky, supra.

We find that defense counsel's failure to attend the pretrial conference was not excused and, therefore, the trial judge committed no error in refusing to set aside the default.

Affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs.


Summaries of

Kiilunen v. Moodie

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 15, 1974
55 Mich. App. 128 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Kiilunen v. Moodie

Case Details

Full title:KIILUNEN v MOODIE

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 15, 1974

Citations

55 Mich. App. 128 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974)
222 N.W.2d 303

Citing Cases

May v. Dep't of Nat Resources

Defendant relies on Bludders v State Farm Mutual Ins Co, 52 Mich. App. 714; 218 N.W.2d 107 (1974), a case…