From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

K.G., Grajeda v. Winter Springs Com

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 2, 1987
509 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Summary

holding tree with surrounding brick border on which child struck his knee while playing football was not a dangerous condition or concealed peril; therefore, church had no duty to warn or take other precautionary measures

Summary of this case from Pio v. Simon Capital GP

Opinion

No. 86-1707.

July 2, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seminole County, Vernon C. Mize, Jr. J.

James D. Mapp, of Mapp Davis, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

Stacy K. Britton, of Stalnaker and Simmons, Casselberry, for appellees.


Appellants, K.G. a minor, bringing suit by and through his parents, Frank and Carolyn Grajeda, and the Grajedas individually, appeal from a summary final judgment in favor of Winter Springs Community Evangelical Church which denies them any recovery for personal injuries suffered by the child on the church's premises. They contend that protruding, uneven bricks placed around the base of a tree on the church property constituted a dangerous and hazardous condition, which gave rise to the church's duty to warn about the bricks or to provide better lighting for the premises. We affirm.

The record established that the child attended a youth group at the church, which ended earlier than the usual time of 7:30 p.m. The incident occurred in November of 1981, and it was dark outside. However, there was sufficient light from flood lights on the corners of the building to permit K.G. and at least one other boy to throw and catch a football. While running, K.G. tripped on a rock in the yard, and struck his knee on one of the bricks surrounding the tree. He ultimately suffered serious damage to the cartilage in his knee, which required arthroscopic surgery.

We affirm because we do not think that a tree with a surrounding brick border constitutes a dangerous condition or concealed peril. There was therefore no duty on the part of the church to warn or take other precautionary measures, such as installing better lighting.

See Cassel v. Price, 396 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 407 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1981); Meyer v. Torrey, 452 So.2d 672 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.


Summaries of

K.G., Grajeda v. Winter Springs Com

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 2, 1987
509 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

holding tree with surrounding brick border on which child struck his knee while playing football was not a dangerous condition or concealed peril; therefore, church had no duty to warn or take other precautionary measures

Summary of this case from Pio v. Simon Capital GP

holding tree with surrounding brick border on which child struck his knee while playing football was not a dangerous condition or concealed peril; therefore, church had no duty to warn or take other precautionary measures

Summary of this case from Dampier v. Morgan Tire & Auto, LLC

finding that "we do not think that a tree with a surrounding brick border constitutes a dangerous condition or concealed peril. There was therefore no duty on the part of the church to warn or take other precautionary measures, such as installing better lighting"

Summary of this case from Collias v. Gateway Acad. of Walton Cnty., Inc.
Case details for

K.G., Grajeda v. Winter Springs Com

Case Details

Full title:K.G., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS FRANK AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 2, 1987

Citations

509 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Trugreen Landcare, LLC v. Lacapra

In particular, landscaping features "are generally found not to constitute a dangerous condition as a matter…

Wolf v. Sam's E., Inc.

Relying on a line of Fifth District and Third District cases, the court wrote that “[l]andscaping features…