Opinion
11-23-2021
KEYBANK, N.A. v. Emre YAZAR et al.
Geoffrey K. Milne, Christopher J. Picard and Victoria L. Forcella, in support of the petition. Ozlem Yazar, self-represented, in opposition.
Geoffrey K. Milne, Christopher J. Picard and Victoria L. Forcella, in support of the petition.
Ozlem Yazar, self-represented, in opposition.
The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 206 Conn. App. 625, 261 A.3d 9 (2021), is granted, limited to the following issues:
"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that a mortgagee's failure to comply with the Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program (EMAP) notice requirements set forth in General Statutes § 8-265ee (a) deprives the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction over the mortgagee's foreclosure action?
"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that an EMAP notice that had been sent by a mortgagee to a mortgagor prior to a first foreclosure action, which was later dismissed, did not satisfy the notice requirements of § 8-265ee (a) in connection with a second foreclosure action subsequently commenced against the mortgagor based on the same default under the same mortgage?"