Summary
applying Heck to bar claims of false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution
Summary of this case from Ryals v. City of HanahanOpinion
No. 12-2480
03-28-2013
Alonzo Key, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01613-DCN) Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alonzo Key, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Alonzo Key appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Key v. Miano, No. 1:11-cv-01613-DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED