From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Key-Kanuteh v. Kenia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 2001
288 A.D.2d 16 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

November 1, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered on or about November 22, 2000, which granted defendant's motion made pursuant to CPLR 503 and 510(1) for a change of venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

John R. Kelligrew, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bruce Roth, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Rosenberger, Tom, Wallach, Rubin, JJ.


Defendant's motion to change venue, as of right, from Bronx County to Westchester County, where defendant resides, was properly granted. The police accident report showed plaintiff as having a Westchester County address and plaintiff, in opposition to defendant's timely motion, failed to offer any documentary evidence to support her conclusory claim that she was a Bronx resident at the time she commenced her personal injury action (see, Buziashhvili v. Ryan, 264 A.D.2d 797; Gladstone v. Syverston, 186 A.D.2d 400; Martinez v. Semicevic, 178 A.D.2d 228). Her total claimed period of residence in the Bronx was 3½ months, with the filing of the action occurring about half-way into that period.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Key-Kanuteh v. Kenia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 2001
288 A.D.2d 16 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Key-Kanuteh v. Kenia

Case Details

Full title:LINDA KEY-KANUTEH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIHERN KENIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 16 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

Prawl v. Ajasin

C.P.L.R. § 510(1);Discolo v. River Gas Wash Corp. , 41 AD3d 126 (1st Dep't 2007); Vasquez v. Sonin, 259 AD2d…

LA CARA MIA BAR LOUNGE v. GREAT LOCATIONS

Where movant on a motion to change venue establishes that the venue selected was improper and the opposition…