Opinion
Submitted September 17, 1975
Decided October 16, 1975
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, THOMAS C. CHIMERA, J.
Arthur H. Sobel for appellant.
Henry Harfield and John J.E. Markham, II, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of that court. There must be strict compliance with the documentary requirements of a letter of credit since the issuing bank at once owes independent obligations to its customer and to the beneficiary of the letter of credit, and the interests of these two in any given situation may be divergent, if not conflicting.
Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.