Summary
finding that, contrary to plaintiff's arguments, the record supported an RFC limiting plaintiff to "occasional" contact with coworkers rather than elimination of all interactions—citing plaintiff's ability to travel outside of the home, shop, and attend movies
Summary of this case from Coler v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Opinion
Case No. 15-12675
08-04-2016
LAUREN KERESI, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE PATRICIA T. MORRIS
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [14]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [11]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12]
Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an Administrative Law Judge's denial of her application for child's insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On May 20, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #14] on the parties' motions for summary judgment [11, 12]. Neither party has filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation.
The Court having reviewed the record, the Report and Recommendation [14] is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [11] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [12] is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
s/Arthur J. Tarnow
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge Dated: August 4, 2016