From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennerly v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jan 7, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-01540 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 7, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-01540

01-07-2016

KAREN L. KENNERLY, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Complaint seeking review of the decision of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Carolyn W. Colvin ("Commissioner") [ECF 1]. On February 17, 2015, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Cheryl A. Eifert for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation ("PF&R"). Magistrate Judge Eifert filed her PF&R [ECF 12] on December 8, 2015, recommending that this Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner and dismiss this matter from the Court's docket.

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Plaintiff's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). In addition, this Court need not conduct a de novo review when a party "makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the Court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982).

Objections to the PF&R were due on December 28, 2015. To date, no objections have been filed.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R [ECF 12], DENIES Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [ECF 10], GRANTS the Commissioner's request for judgment on the pleadings [ECF 11], AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the Complaint, and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the Court's docket. A separate Judgment Order will enter this day implementing the rulings contained herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: January 7, 2016

/s/_________

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Kennerly v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jan 7, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-01540 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Kennerly v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:KAREN L. KENNERLY, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Jan 7, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-01540 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 7, 2016)

Citing Cases

Gibson v. Kijakazi

. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1566(b), 416.966 (b); see Kennerly v. Colvin, No. 2:15-CV-01540, 2015 WL 9672913, at *13…