From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Nov 30, 2016
No. 04-16-00673-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 30, 2016)

Opinion

No. 04-16-00673-CR

11-30-2016

Gary KENNEDY, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014CR7948
Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice DISMISSED

On October 20, 2016, we notified appellant this appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record by November 10, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication). Appellant's appointed appellate counsel filed a written response, stating he "is unable to present the Court with an Amended Certification." No amended certification showing appellant has the right of appeal has been made part of the record. After reviewing the record, we agree appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk's record to determine whether trial court's certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH


Summaries of

Kennedy v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Nov 30, 2016
No. 04-16-00673-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Kennedy v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gary KENNEDY, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Nov 30, 2016

Citations

No. 04-16-00673-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 30, 2016)

Citing Cases

Kennedy v. Lumpkin

83).The Fourth Court of Appeals dismissed Petitioner's subsequent appeal because he waived the right to…