From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Kennedy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 7, 1994
638 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-2193.

June 7, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Bernard S. Shapiro, J.

Mark H. Klein, Miami, for appellant.

Shapiro and Associates, and Michael A. Vandetty, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.


Appellant, Sally R. Kennedy (wife), appeals an order granting the petition of appellee, Harold E. Kennedy (husband), for modification and/or enforcement of a final judgment. We affirm.

This appealed order seeks to enforce the distribution of proceeds from the sale of the parties' former marital residence, as provided in the amended final judgment. The wife failed to comply with the amended final judgment and made no payments towards the parties' marital debt. The husband made all payments necessary on the outstanding debt. The enforcement order authorized the husband to receive the balance of the second mortgage as reimbursement for the wife's share of the parties' marital debt.

Because the appealed order pertains to property distributed by the dissolution judgment, the trial court has jurisdiction. Gutjahr v. Gutjahr, 368 So.2d 93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Courts retain jurisdiction to enforce dissolution judgments with or without a specific reservation of such power. Seng v. Seng, 590 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Kennedy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 7, 1994
638 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Kennedy

Case Details

Full title:SALLY R. KENNEDY, APPELLANT, v. HAROLD E. KENNEDY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 7, 1994

Citations

638 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Teague v. Teague

On appeal, the Fifth District noted that “[t]o enforce a prior judgment, a court may modify a final judgment…

Smilack v. Smilack

However, civil contempt power may not be used to compel a former spouse to pay his or her share of a third…