From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Hughes

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Aug 19, 2011
No. CV-11-8105-PCT-GMS (D. Ariz. Aug. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV-11-8105-PCT-GMS.

August 19, 2011


ORDER


Pursuant to the Court's Order (Doc. 4) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Court has screened Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 6). Pursuant to that screening Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed.

I. Plaintiff's Complaint

II. Dismissal without Leave to Amend

Sommatino v. U.S. 255 F.3d 704 Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc. 885 F.2d 531538Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe v. United States90 F.3d 351355Moore885 F.2d at 538

The Court finds that further amendment of Plaintiff's claims would be futile. Therefore, the Court, in its discretion, will dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint without leave to amend.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Motion for Court Order (Doc. 5).


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Hughes

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Aug 19, 2011
No. CV-11-8105-PCT-GMS (D. Ariz. Aug. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:Matthew James Kennedy, Plaintiff, v. Karen Hughes, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Aug 19, 2011

Citations

No. CV-11-8105-PCT-GMS (D. Ariz. Aug. 19, 2011)