From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Dallas Police Department

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jan 3, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-0716-G (N.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2007)

Summary

recognizing that plaintiff may bring Section 1983 action only for deprivations he suffered

Summary of this case from Barnes v. Givens

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-0716-G.

January 3, 2007


ORDER


After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the findings and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby accepted as the findings of the court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Dallas Police Department

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jan 3, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-0716-G (N.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2007)

recognizing that plaintiff may bring Section 1983 action only for deprivations he suffered

Summary of this case from Barnes v. Givens

compiling decisions finding that flu symptoms "do not constitute 'serious harm' necessary to establish an Eighth Amendment violation"

Summary of this case from Price v. Leblanc
Case details for

Kennedy v. Dallas Police Department

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH KENNEDY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Jan 3, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-0716-G (N.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2007)

Citing Cases

Vega v. Aviles

See also, e.g., Est. of Lillis by & through Lillis v. Correct Care Sols., LLC, No. 16-03038, 2018 WL…

Teno v. Stinson

In Resendez v. Texas, 440 Fed.Appx. 305, 306 (5th Cir. 2011), for example, the court held that “to the extent…