From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendrick v. Ardnt

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division
May 1, 2009
Civil No. 08-5242 (W.D. Ark. May. 1, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-5242.

May 1, 2009


ORDER


Now on this 1st day of May, 2009, comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R R) issued by the Honorable James Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas (Doc. #5). The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds and orders as follows with respect to the same:

1. Catherynne W. Kendrick filed objections (Doc. # 6) the R R. They are without merit and are denied.

2. The Court, having considered the R R, and the objections, finds and orders that the R R should be, and it hereby is adopted in toto.

3. Accordingly, Catherynne Kendrick's IFP status is revoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Further, this matter is dismissed on the grounds that the claims are frivolous and fail to state claims upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii) (IFP action may be dismissed on such grounds at any time).

4. In addition, Ms. Kendrick is ordered to refrain from filing any future civil action IFP unless she is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. Accordingly, the clerk of this Court is directed to provisionally file any new action in which Catherynne W. Kendrick seeks to proceed IFP. The magistrate judge shall then review the action and, if it is a civil action rather than a criminal or habeas one, and, if Kendrick has not asserted a valid claim that she is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, the magistrate judge shall recommend that IFP status be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Kendrick v. Ardnt

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division
May 1, 2009
Civil No. 08-5242 (W.D. Ark. May. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Kendrick v. Ardnt

Case Details

Full title:CATHERYNNE W. KENDRICK; RAY YOUNGBLOOD KENDRICK; JERRY TRACKE; and LIONELL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division

Date published: May 1, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-5242 (W.D. Ark. May. 1, 2009)

Citing Cases

Hernandez v. Hollingsworth

In Arkansas, a three-year statute of limitations applies to Bivens claims. See Kendrick v. Ardnt, No.…