From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendall v. Pilkington

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 17, 1999
731 A.2d 307 (Conn. 1999)

Opinion

Decided March 17, 1999


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 18736) is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly grant the plaintiff's motion to dismiss, which asserted that the defendant was in contempt of court, notwithstanding that the defendant appealed from one of the trial court's findings of contempt, had purged himself of the other findings of contempt and despite the fact that the trial court vacated its last finding of contempt thereby mooting the issues raised in the motion to dismiss?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16082.

Richard G. Kent and Vincent M. Marino, in support of the petition.

David M. Somers, in opposition.


Summaries of

Kendall v. Pilkington

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 17, 1999
731 A.2d 307 (Conn. 1999)
Case details for

Kendall v. Pilkington

Case Details

Full title:RUTH A. KENDALL v. MICHAEL PILKINGTON

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 17, 1999

Citations

731 A.2d 307 (Conn. 1999)
248 Conn. 909

Citing Cases

Kendall v. Pilkington

We granted the defendant's petition, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly grant…