From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kendall v. Klinger

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 22, 1967
383 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 21029.

August 11, 1967. Rehearing Denied September 22, 1967.

James Lane Kendall, San Gabriel, Cal., for appellant in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Robert H. Francis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, JOHNSEN and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.


The appeal is dismissed as moot because the appellant has been released from state custody. See Parker v. Ellis, 362 U.S. 574, 80 S.Ct. 909, 4 L.Ed.2d 963.

Were we to pass over this point, which we cannot, it could be suggested to appellant that he has made no attack on the first of two convictions. Thus, civil rights to vote (which he now wants to vindicate here) could not be vindicated because of the first conviction, even if we could eradicate his second conviction.


Summaries of

Kendall v. Klinger

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 22, 1967
383 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Kendall v. Klinger

Case Details

Full title:James Lane KENDALL, Appellant, v. John H. KLINGER, Superintendent…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 22, 1967

Citations

383 F.2d 436 (9th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Brady v. United States Parole Com'n

On this record the case is moot.Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, 96 S.Ct. 347, 46 L.Ed.2d 350 (1975); Roe…