From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1982
88 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

May 10, 1982


Appeal by the claimants from an order of the Court of Claims (Amann, J.), entered August 12, 1981, which denied their motion pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 10 CTC of the Court of Claims Act for leave to file a late notice of claim. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and claimants' motion to file a late notice of claim is granted. Under the circumstances of this case, the Court of Claims erred when it denied claimants' motion on the ground that they failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for not filing a timely notice of claim. "[T]he tender of a reasonable excuse * * * is not a precondition to permission to file a late claim such as to constitute a sine qua non for the requested relief * * * Nothing in the statute makes the presence or absence of any one factor determinative." ( Bay Terrace Coop. Section IV v. New York State Employees' Retirement System, Policemen's Firemen's Retirement System, 55 N.Y.2d 979, 981; Matter of Butler v. State of New York, 81 A.D.2d 834.) In our view, the motion should have been granted. Damiani, J.P., Lazer, Gibbons and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kelly v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1982
88 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Kelly v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES K. KELLY et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Weaver v. State

Although a claim against the State must normally be filed "within ninety days after the accrual of such…

Quirk v. Morrissey

The attorneys for the parties entered into settlement discussions during the spring of 1982, at which time…