From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelly v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 2002
300 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2002-02371

December 2, 2002.

December 23, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated January 15, 2002, as, upon reargument and renewal, vacated an order of the same court, dated September 18, 2001, granting that branch of his motion which was to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, and denied those branches of his motion which were to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and on the ground of collateral estoppel.

Epstein, Grammatico Gann, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Oliver Raymond Voorhees III of counsel), for appellant.

William P. Griffin III (Kujawski Dellicarpini, Deer Park, N.Y. [Jeffrey D. Hummel] of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that personal jurisdiction was acquired over the defendant when he was personally served with process while present in New York (see CPLR 301; Burnham v. Superior Ct. of California, 495 U.S. 604; Alexander, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C301:2, at 11-12).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, CRANE and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kelly v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 2002
300 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Kelly v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:SERENA KELLY, ET AL., respondents, v. ROBERT A. KELLY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
752 N.Y.S.2d 567

Citing Cases

Tamman v. Schinazi

The concept of jurisdiction by a defendant's presence in New York under CPLR § 301, also known as transient…

Engelhardt v. Abraham

Therefore, because Abraham was personally served with the summons and complaint while he was in New York,…