From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 28, 2014
563 F. App'x 769 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2012-5106 2012-5115

03-28-2014

KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Cross Appellant.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 09-CV-351, Judge Christine O.C. Miller.

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND

REHEARING EN BANC


Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK,

PROST, MOORE, O'MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO,

and CHEN, Circuit Judges.

Circuit Judge Hughes did not participate.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by the defendant-cross-appellant. Plaintiff-appellant moved for leave to file a reply in support of its petition. The petition was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, the response, and the motion for leave to file a reply were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Defendant-cross-appellant United States also filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by the plaintiff-appellant. The petition was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response were referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The petition for panel rehearing filed by plaintiff-appellant Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. is denied.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc filed by plaintiff-appellant Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. is denied.
(3) The petition for panel rehearing filed by defendant-cross-appellant United States is granted-in-part for the limited purpose of deleting the words
"at the Court of Federal Claims" from page 1366 of the opinion, reported at 728 F.3d 1348. An errata sheet is attached. The panel denies the petition for panel rehearing in all other respects.
(4) The petition for rehearing en banc filed by defendant-cross-appellant United States is denied.
(5) The motion of plaintiff-appellant to withdraw counsel Eric A. White is granted.
(6) The motion of plaintiff-appellant for leave to file a reply in support of its petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
(7) The mandate of the court will issue on April 4, 2014.

FOR THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court

ERRATA


Appeal Nos. 2012-5106, -5115


KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC.


v.


UNITED STATES


Decided: September 5, 2013

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following change: Page 29, line 30, delete "at the Court of Federal Claims."


Summaries of

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 28, 2014
563 F. App'x 769 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 28, 2014

Citations

563 F. App'x 769 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mgmt. Consulting

Similarly, the Federal Circuit has upheld a civil penalty against a defendant prime contractor without…

United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.

As previously noted, the government may “recover a civil penalty from any person who knowingly engages in…