From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kelley v. Lane

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 3, 2004
2004 Ohio 5582 (Ohio 2004)

Opinion

No. 2004-0976.

Submitted September 15, 2004.

Decided November 3, 2004.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 04CA12.

Shawn P. Kelley, pro se.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and J. Joseph Bodine Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


{¶ 1} In February 2004, appellant, Shawn P. Kelley, filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Richland County for a writ of habeas corpus to compel appellee, his prison warden, to release him from confinement. On February 25, the court of appeals dismissed the petition.

We grant Kelley's unopposed motion to name his current prison warden, Gordon Lane, as appellee.

{¶ 2} On March 11, 2004, Kelley moved for relief from the February 25, 2004 judgment based on Civ.R. 60 and the court's inherent authority. He asserted that the court of appeals had erred in denying his habeas corpus petition. On May 17, 2004, the court of appeals denied Kelley's motion.

{¶ 3} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. A motion for relief from judgment cannot be used as a substitute for a timely appeal. State ex rel. Howard v. Doneghy, 102 Ohio St.3d 355, 2004-Ohio-3207, 810 N.E.2d 958, ¶ 8. In fact, Kelley appealed from the same judgment from which he now seeks relief. Kelley v. Wilson, 103 Ohio St.3d 201, 2004-Ohio-4883, 814 N.E.2d 1222. In that appeal, we rejected the claims that Kelley raises here.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR and O'DONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Kelley v. Lane

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 3, 2004
2004 Ohio 5582 (Ohio 2004)
Case details for

Kelley v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:Kelley, Appellant, v. Lane, Warden, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 3, 2004

Citations

2004 Ohio 5582 (Ohio 2004)
2004 Ohio 5582

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank v. Bartlett

(Citation omitted.) Blatt v. Meridia Health Sys., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 89074, 2008-Ohio-1818, ¶ 11, citing…

Thompson v. Dodson-Thompson

Thus, the gravamen of his motion was that the terms of the spousal support and property division contained in…