From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keller v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 14, 2011
457 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-1797

12-14-2011

DAVID W. KELLER, and all Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION; BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, President of the United States of America; TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States of America, Defendants - Appellees.

David W. Keller, Appellant Pro Se. Helen L. Gilbert, Michael Raab, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00471-JRS)

Before KING, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David W. Keller, Appellant Pro Se. Helen L. Gilbert, Michael Raab, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David W. Keller appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice Keller's civil complaint for lack of ripeness. Shortly after entry of the district court's order, Congress passed the Budget Control Act of 2011 ("the Act"), Pub. L. No. 112-25, 125 Stat. 240 (2011), which raised the federal debt ceiling. Given the passage of the Act, the legal basis for Keller's complaint — that the failure to raise the debt ceiling would cause the country to default on its foreign debt, which in turn would necessitate the Government to withhold Social Security benefits payments — is no longer viable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v. Hardy, 545 F.3d 280, 285 (4th Cir. 2008) (explaining that this court should dismiss an appeal "when, by virtue of an intervening event, a court of appeals cannot grant any effectual relief whatever in favor of the appellant" (internal quotation marks omitted)). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Keller v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 14, 2011
457 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Keller v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID W. KELLER, and all Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 14, 2011

Citations

457 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2011)