From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keifer Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska, Omaha Division
Aug 5, 1937
22 F. Supp. 918 (D. Neb. 1937)

Opinion

No. 3627.

August 5, 1937.

Perry, Van Pelt Marti, of Lincoln, Neb., for plaintiffs.

Francis P. Matthews and Wm. P. Kelley, both of Omaha, Neb., for Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

L.W. Powers and C.J. Thurston, both of Omaha, Neb., for Regional Agricultural Credit Corporation.


We have had under consideration the demurrers of the defendants, which, among other things, challenge the jurisdiction of this court over the persons of the defendants. Oral arguments have been had, and extensive written briefs have been filed.

We have arrived at the conclusion that the defendants are instrumentalities of the United States, created by Congress for the purpose of performing governmental functions; that the United States is the real party in interest (see Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Krauss, D.C., 12 F. Supp. 44, where cases dealing with the question are collected and discussed); that since the United States may not be sued without its consent, neither can the instrumentalities of the government be sued without permission of the Congress. No authority has been granted by Congress to sue these defendants in this jurisdiction, and consequently we hold that the court is without jurisdiction, and that it is incumbent upon the plaintiffs to prosecute their claim elsewhere in the mode and manner authorized.

The demurrers, and each of them, will be sustained, and the cause dismissed. Exception will be allowed.


Summaries of

Keifer Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska, Omaha Division
Aug 5, 1937
22 F. Supp. 918 (D. Neb. 1937)
Case details for

Keifer Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KEIFER KEIFER v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION et al

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska, Omaha Division

Date published: Aug 5, 1937

Citations

22 F. Supp. 918 (D. Neb. 1937)

Citing Cases

Schevitzky v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.

The judgment, if satisfied, would be paid by the United States. Hence, this is in reality an action against…

Carver v. Haynes

" 278 N.W. page 901. It is interesting to note that Justice Peterson declined to follow the decision in…