From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Keating v. Conviser, Perlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

March, 1927.


Order setting aside verdict and dismissing complaint, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law, with costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs. We are of opinion that defendants' letter of complaint was libelous per se, especially in view of defendants' letter to plaintiff, written in advance of said libelous communication. If there were any doubt about the meaning of defendants' letter of complaint, the question was for the jury. Kelly, P.J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Verdict was for $1,500 ordinary damages and for $500 punitive damages, making a total of $2,000 in an action for libel imputing dishonesty. For opinion of Trial Term see 127 Misc. 531. — [REP.


Summaries of

Keating v. Conviser, Perlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1927
219 App. Div. 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Keating v. Conviser, Perlin

Case Details

Full title:ALICE KEATING, Appellant, v. DAVID J. CONVISER and PHILIP PERLIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1927

Citations

219 App. Div. 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Citing Cases

Quina v. Robert's

See 33 American Jurisprudence, section 60, pages 78 and 79, under the title "Libel and Slander", and 36…