Kearney v. State

Full title: JAMES T. KEARNEY ET AL. v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT ET AL

Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 19, 1977

378 A.2d 607 (Conn. 1977)

174 Conn. 765

Opinion

Martin B. Burke, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Frank B. Cochran, for the appellants (intervening defendant Robert Santacroce et al.).

Argued October 19, 1977

Decided October 19, 1977

Frank Cochran, in support of the motion.

Submitted October 18, 1977

Decided October 19, 1977

The plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.

The motion by the intervening defendants Robert and Nancy Santacroce for permission to waive the printing requirements of their supplemental brief without compliance with 723 of the Practice Book in the appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is denied.