From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kaza v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1978
65 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

November 10, 1978

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Moule, Simons, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant's inspection of the medical and hospital records of the Cleveland Clinic should have been permitted pursuant to CPLR 3121 (see Mendelson v Shein, 58 A.D.2d 859; Greuling v Breakey, 56 A.D.2d 540, 542). Plaintiffs may not successfully contend that because they do not intend to have a representative of the Cleveland Clinic testify at the time of the trial, 22 NYCRR 1024.25 forecloses disclosure of these records to defendant (Brooks v Hausauer, 51 A.D.2d 660). The time for plaintiff Pamela Kaza to furnish the authorization is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon.


Summaries of

Kaza v. Gardner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1978
65 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Kaza v. Gardner

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA KAZA et al., Respondents, v. ARTHUR J. GARDNER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1978

Citations

65 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Ricciuti v. Schaghticoke

" Thus, the report of a treating physician who plaintiff elected not to call as a witness upon the trial and…

Calhoun v. Pickett

CPLR 3101 (subd [a]) requires "full disclosure of all evidence material and necessary in the prosecution or…