From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kavandi v. Kijakazi

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 21, 2021
No. 20-55740 (9th Cir. Dec. 21, 2021)

Opinion

20-55740

12-21-2021

DAVID KAVANDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted December 14, 2021

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01252-CAS-AS Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

David Kavandi appeals pro se from the district court's affirmance of the Appeals Council's dismissal of his request for review of an ALJ's decision granting disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Smith v. Berryhill, 139 S.Ct. 1765, 1780 (2019) (holding that an Appeals Council dismissal as untimely of a request for review, after a claimant has received an ALJ hearing on the merits, is a final decision for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)). We review de novo, Attmore v. Colvin, 827 F.3d 872, 875 (9th Cir. 2016), and we affirm.

The Appeals Council did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Kavandi's request for review, where Kavandi failed to show good cause to excuse his untimely filing. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.911 (discussing good cause). Even accepting Kavandi's assertion that he did not know his attorney amended the alleged onset date, Kavandi did not show good cause where he did not dispute receiving the ALJ's notice, the ALJ's decision, and the subsequent award notice, and he did not allege that these materials contained incorrect or incomplete information. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.911(b)(6)-(7) (a claimant may show good cause where, for example, the Commissioner provided "incorrect or incomplete information about when and how to request administrative review" or where the claimant "did not receive notice of the determination or decision").

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kavandi v. Kijakazi

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 21, 2021
No. 20-55740 (9th Cir. Dec. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Kavandi v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:DAVID KAVANDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 21, 2021

Citations

No. 20-55740 (9th Cir. Dec. 21, 2021)

Citing Cases

Curlee v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Smith v. Berryhill, 139 S.Ct. 1765, 1771, 1780 (2019); see also Kavandi v. Kijakazi, No. 20-55740, 2021 WL…